What about you, my dear friend?

Today we needed to evaluate the performance of our groupmate using our table.

The topic of Polina's speech was about the stage fright.

1. Introduction.

What technique(s) was used in the introduction? I don't think that any techniques were used in this presentation.

Any link-element? The statement that stage fright is connected with communication.

Was the thesis statement given? There was not a clear thesis statement in the introduction.

How effective was the introduction? I think that writing is hard to impress people. Maybe during an oral presentation it would be more spectacular.

Points:  6

2. Body.

How well structured was the information presented? The speech was well prepared and well structured.   Points: 10

What organizational structure was used in the body of the speech? The speaker used organizational patterns.

How understandable was the information (was it clearly explained)? Since the presentation was written, the topic of the presentation was well disclosed.   Points: 10

Quality of point-support (appropriateness, completeness, variety).  Points: Lots of (10)

Use of facts, illustrations, examples, stories.   Points: Some (5)

Was it coherent?  Points: 10

Points:  7

3. Conclusion.

What technique(s) was used in the conclusion? There were no special techniques in the conclusion.

Were all the steps followed (summary, action, emotional appeal?) Yes.

How effective was the conclusion? As stated earlier, using a written response is difficult to impress people.  Points: 5

Points:  5


What do you think? How would you rate this performance?