What about you, my dear friend? #fromthepast

Hello!

This time I had to evaluate the speech of one of the students who gave their speech in the past!

The speech is about the London Eye.

1. Introduction.

What technique(s) was used in the introduction? The speaker used the "Asking questions" technique.

Any link-element? It was given in the speech

Was the thesis statement given? Yes, the thesis statement was given: "Have you ever been to London? If you have, you must have seen the eye of it - the British Airways London Eye."

How effective was the introduction? The introduction was understandable.

Points:  8

2. Body.

How well structured was the information presented? The speech was well structured.   Points: 9

What organizational structure was used in the body of the speech? The speaker used outlining and used a lot of supporting material.

How understandable was the information (was it clearly explained)? Points: 9

Quality of point-support (appropriateness, completeness, variety).  Points: Lots of (9)

Use of facts, illustrations, examples, stories.   Points: Some (10)

Was it coherent?  Points: 10

Points:  9

3. Conclusion.

What technique(s) was used in the conclusion? There was a summarizing the major points of speaker's speech.

Were all the steps followed (summary, action, emotional appeal?) Yes.

How effective was the conclusion? Points: Very effective (8)

Points:  8

I think this is a good speech, but I would expand the introduction and conclusion. The body of this speech was vast and interesting, but at the beginning and at the end of the speech I would like more information, more oral illustrations and the speaker’s personal experience. Well, in addition to this, of course I would like to listen to this speech live. Maybe then I would not be so critical, and I would not want to add what I said above. There is no telling... :)